Photo: Marc Chagall, The Ark of Noah (1961-1966).  All species tend to aggregate and organize - Power depends on organization. There is an analogy between animals and plants and can be considered from a Darwinian point of view: all human species tend to aggregate and organize, man in social organizations Photo: Marc Chagall, The Ark of Noah (1961-1966). All species tend to aggregate and organize - Power depends on organization. There is an analogy between animals and plants and can be considered from a Darwinian point of view: all human species tend to aggregate and organize, man in social organizations

The feeling that makes up the psychological source of power and tradition in its obsequious appearance for Kings, priests, party bosses are: fear and personal ambition that originate power.

The power of the organizations through which power is exercised, considering them first as bodies endowed with a life of its own in relation to forms of Government and finally on the lives of individuals.

There is a biology on organizations for the fact that an organization has a life of its own and the tendency to grow and die.

There is an analogy between animals and plants and can be considered from a Darwinian point of view: all human species tend to aggregate and organize, man in social organizations. Power depends on the Organization, this becomes powerful by its spread, let's see: church, political party, and the internet gave power to a globalized Isis, which does not have a real leader unless the network and its global spread of a destructive message; why do not make a constructive one?

This is what drives these messages!

An organization is a set of people (or thought form) gathered from different parts of the world, in a series of activities for public purposes. It may be voluntary, as a circle; a biological group, as a family or tribe, or mandatory as a State.

The purpose of the organization can be explicit or hidden (Isis), military or political, but for its nature and purpose: economic or religious it implies a redistribution of power, there is usually an internal government that makes decisions on behalf of the entire group and has powers greater than that of the individual members.

As men become more civilized and technique more complex and globalized advantages are becoming more obvious, but organizations imply renunciation of independence, it increases the power over others, but also that of the other one over us.

Organizations are defined for two important aspects: the size and intensity of power, holding power over members. Both these tendencies may be stopped for intrinsic reasons: a chess club to win can count among its members all the players with some skill winning over others. The most obvious example is that of the State. Each enough powerful State wants to conquer foreign countries. Governments have always strived to reach, in the political field, the concentration of power.

In times of war all rapid means of communication are controlled by the Government, less, currently the new means of communication that are at the mercy of everyone.

With modern technology and the speed of the network to transmit messages, it's time to become network " partisans ", to send messages is not necessary to be in peace, equality, etc... but to love independence and justice, despite this general rule of far away power, the current state is inefficient because every people work for his own garden, we must globalize remotely with the network then there will be a power intensity and everyone will be for his own, but all will be for everyone.

Прочитано 489 раз Последнее изменение Суббота, 20 мая 2017 11:45

Похожие материалы (по тегу)

In this article, I would like to focus on Violence and provide an insight into all its various aspects.

It goes without saying that the approach to violence takes on either an objective or a subjective connotation depending on the subjects who use violence, i.e. the oppressed or the ruling class.

Put simply, it is impossible to equate the violence of the "Settler" with the violence of the "Colonized person": the violence of the Settler against the Colonised person and the violence of the latter against the former; these "two" kinds of violence are clearly distinct.

In fact, the violence of the Rich and the violence of the Poor are not the same thing: the Poor actually fight against the root of the power and try to redeem themselves from the violence suffered, which in turn addresses the weak and urges the poor to put the blame for their failure on the lowest, forever repeating the reasons underlying their own failure and oppression.

Obviously, the violence of the Poor who wants to take the place of the rich, thus vexing those who are equally poor or even poorer, looks like the violence of the Rich, since it is based on the same feelings of envy, oppression, grudge and revenge.

This behaviour feeds the violence of the Rich and is also responsible for it.

This violence-revenge does not express the urgency to totally overcome one’s status of exploited or exploiter, as the "grudge" does not rely on "the Last will be the First, and the First will be the Last, so that there will be neither First nor Last."

However, from a logical point of view, the violence used by the "Rich" is different, because the rich can draw on countless resources to act in the name of beauty, magnanimity, mercy, pity and in harmony with the whole world, while the Servants are needy and deprived of the enlightened rationality, therefore they are generally less free and aware than the Rich or even than those who are neither rich nor poor, but released from opposing antagonisms.

Someone asked us: "Modern prophetism often talks about God, so what is God for you? And what religion do you profess? What is the meaning of this word? Are there any other Gods? If so, who are they?" 

A. as soon as you cease to be, you will become God.

However, please remember that Modern Prophetism has always regarded this entity as "The Great Light", I will tell you why later on.

All the religions, without any exception, believe that men have had a soul since their birth.

Throughout the history of mankind, Giorgio Gurdjieff is the only one who has astonishingly said: "You don’t have any soul."

The only one! Despite the various religions.

Gurdjieff stands out from the crowd and claims that men have no soul; therefore, the place intended for the soul is actually empty.

Anyhow, we may try to create it.

Другие материалы в этой категории: « Peace Meaning The Meaning of Life »

Оставить комментарий

Убедитесь, что Вы ввели всю требуемую информацию, в поля, помеченные звёздочкой (*). HTML код не допустим.

Human Rights

Prophetic Knowledge

The New Man

Современный пророк

Modern Prophets - Principles of Humanistic Logic