The Prophets of Globalisation

Пятница, 07 октября 2016 15:44 Автор
Photo: Marc Chagall (1887-1985) Paris through the window (1913). On the left, below, a human figure with two faces to represent the dual nature of man: who orders and who follows. In the middle the cat humanization of the nomadic nature and not submissive. Photo: Marc Chagall (1887-1985) Paris through the window (1913). On the left, below, a human figure with two faces to represent the dual nature of man: who orders and who follows. In the middle the cat humanization of the nomadic nature and not submissive.

We must consider that there are two kinds of pursuit of power, already identified in the past, and two elements: a ruler and his/her follower (Christ and the apostles, all the prophets and devotees.)

We must understand that men tend to adhere to the ideals conveyed by the ruler and, if they strongly believe in them, they will follow him/her voluntarily, sharing his/her victories as well.

Therefore, a ruler is always needed, because many people do not know that they possess the requisites – thought, strength and willpower – necessary to achieve a positive result, although they are aware of the fact that it is impossible to help all the people. Anyhow, they can come to the aid of most of them!

A modern prophet must oppose the fanaticism that divides humanity into two groups pitted against each other through the most evil means of destruction, the balance of terror cannot prevent wars but rather masks other reasons: the power over the helpless masses.

The prophet Elijah as well as Gandhi in India, among others, emphasised the "You shall not kill" moral imperative as the assumption underlying any progress and human evolution.

Yet, in spite of this teaching, we are bloodguilt! We kill someone not only during stupid battles or shootings on the streets: we actually kill them whenever we force the youth to choose a profession, as a matter of necessity, which is not suitable for them.

We kill someone whenever we close our eyes in front of poverty, misery and shame.

Wherever life or future are rising or flourishing, we always stamp on their feet.

Today we need more prophets who shall teach the people, through the new communication media, the rules of equality, taking into account that we are not all equal. In fact, it is necessary to distinguish the submissive from the authoritative men.

According to Adler: "The servile individuals comply with laws and regulations established by other persons; they feel the irresistible urge to carry out servile tasks, which are however deprived of any submission, fear or exploitation; in this context, equality implies the respect for all the works, including the humblest ones.

Nowadays, the Five Star Movement (Italian: Movimento 5 Stelle) may constitute a possible example of modern prophetism, but it still lacks some rules.

We must establish a new relationship between ethics and new prophets, and focus on the development and underdevelopment of the peoples.

I, one of many!

Прочитано 3325 раз Последнее изменение Суббота, 20 мая 2017 11:46

In this article, I would like to focus on Violence and provide an insight into all its various aspects.

It goes without saying that the approach to violence takes on either an objective or a subjective connotation depending on the subjects who use violence, i.e. the oppressed or the ruling class.

Put simply, it is impossible to equate the violence of the "Settler" with the violence of the "Colonized person": the violence of the Settler against the Colonised person and the violence of the latter against the former; these "two" kinds of violence are clearly distinct.

In fact, the violence of the Rich and the violence of the Poor are not the same thing: the Poor actually fight against the root of the power and try to redeem themselves from the violence suffered, which in turn addresses the weak and urges the poor to put the blame for their failure on the lowest, forever repeating the reasons underlying their own failure and oppression.

Obviously, the violence of the Poor who wants to take the place of the rich, thus vexing those who are equally poor or even poorer, looks like the violence of the Rich, since it is based on the same feelings of envy, oppression, grudge and revenge.

This behaviour feeds the violence of the Rich and is also responsible for it.

This violence-revenge does not express the urgency to totally overcome one’s status of exploited or exploiter, as the "grudge" does not rely on "the Last will be the First, and the First will be the Last, so that there will be neither First nor Last."

However, from a logical point of view, the violence used by the "Rich" is different, because the rich can draw on countless resources to act in the name of beauty, magnanimity, mercy, pity and in harmony with the whole world, while the Servants are needy and deprived of the enlightened rationality, therefore they are generally less free and aware than the Rich or even than those who are neither rich nor poor, but released from opposing antagonisms.

Someone asked us: "Modern prophetism often talks about God, so what is God for you? And what religion do you profess? What is the meaning of this word? Are there any other Gods? If so, who are they?" 

A. as soon as you cease to be, you will become God.

However, please remember that Modern Prophetism has always regarded this entity as "The Great Light", I will tell you why later on.

All the religions, without any exception, believe that men have had a soul since their birth.

Throughout the history of mankind, Giorgio Gurdjieff is the only one who has astonishingly said: "You don’t have any soul."

The only one! Despite the various religions.

Gurdjieff stands out from the crowd and claims that men have no soul; therefore, the place intended for the soul is actually empty.

Anyhow, we may try to create it.

Другие материалы в этой категории: « Globalisation of Thoughts The Rules of Modern Prophecy »

1 Комментарий

Оставить комментарий

Human Rights

Prophetic Knowledge

The New Man

Современный пророк

Modern Prophets - Principles of Humanistic Logic